Whenever I watch a murder mystery – whether it’s Sherlock, Broadchurch or Poirot – I never, ever guess who’s committed the crime. Being so stupid and clueless is a good thing because my enjoyment is enhanced by my genuine surprise when the person I least suspected is revealed as the killer. But when I read The Girl on The Train, the latest much-hyped best seller, I guessed who the baddie was almost immediately. And the more I ploughed on through the lumpen, over-descriptive, creative-writing-school prose, the more clunkingly obvious it became. So when my suspicions were finally confirmed, it was a dreary anti-climax. This can be attributed to one of two things: Either I’ve suddenly become a sharp, deductive genius or this is a truly appalling book. And I don’t think it would take Sherlock to come up with the answer.
The joy of being thick.

- White man wit...11th Sep 2016
- Madness in mo...10th Sep 2016
- Showbusiness ...4th Sep 2016
- RIP Willy Won...30th Aug 2016
- Berlin. At l...29th Aug 2016
- So farewell t...28th Aug 2016
- The (not quit...27th Aug 2016
- It's been mor...26th Aug 2016
- The new Lasse...21st Aug 2016
- Why I knew I'...16th Aug 2016
- Usain Bolt an...15th Aug 2016
- On 11th Augus...11th Aug 2016
- I'm going to ...10th Aug 2016
- Oh no, it's b...9th Aug 2016
- Not sure if I...7th Aug 2016 prev next