Whenever I watch a murder mystery – whether it’s Sherlock, Broadchurch or Poirot – I never, ever guess who’s committed the crime. Being so stupid and clueless is a good thing because my enjoyment is enhanced by my genuine surprise when the person I least suspected is revealed as the killer. But when I read The Girl on The Train, the latest much-hyped best seller, I guessed who the baddie was almost immediately. And the more I ploughed on through the lumpen, over-descriptive, creative-writing-school prose, the more clunkingly obvious it became. So when my suspicions were finally confirmed, it was a dreary anti-climax. This can be attributed to one of two things: Either I’ve suddenly become a sharp, deductive genius or this is a truly appalling book. And I don’t think it would take Sherlock to come up with the answer.
The joy of being thick.

- Why this song...1st Jul 2016
- Hart Beat.28th Jun 2016
- Britain votes...24th Jun 2016
- Oh God, this ...23rd Jun 2016
- Going undergr...22nd Jun 2016
- I think I mig...19th Jun 2016
- When I'm Seve...18th Jun 2016
- From priceles...17th Jun 2016
- I didn't stay...14th Jun 2016
- We have to st...12th Jun 2016
- Arise, Sir Ro...11th Jun 2016
- The (sort of)...9th Jun 2016
- It's all gone...8th Jun 2016
- No, I'd never...7th Jun 2016
- A man, two de...6th Jun 2016 prev next