Whenever I watch a murder mystery – whether it’s Sherlock, Broadchurch or Poirot – I never, ever guess who’s committed the crime. Being so stupid and clueless is a good thing because my enjoyment is enhanced by my genuine surprise when the person I least suspected is revealed as the killer. But when I read The Girl on The Train, the latest much-hyped best seller, I guessed who the baddie was almost immediately. And the more I ploughed on through the lumpen, over-descriptive, creative-writing-school prose, the more clunkingly obvious it became. So when my suspicions were finally confirmed, it was a dreary anti-climax. This can be attributed to one of two things: Either I’ve suddenly become a sharp, deductive genius or this is a truly appalling book. And I don’t think it would take Sherlock to come up with the answer.
The joy of being thick.

- I knew I'd se...10th Apr 2016
- 19719th Apr 2016
- The ill-manne...2nd Apr 2016
- The best Two ...1st Apr 2016
- Geek Chic.31st Mar 2016
- Frank Skinner...30th Mar 2016
- I'm not going...29th Mar 2016
- The Imaginati...28th Mar 2016
- This one's fo...27th Mar 2016
- Bad Friday.26th Mar 2016
- What I liked ...25th Mar 2016
- The First Lad...24th Mar 2016
- I think we'll...22nd Mar 2016
- England win t...20th Mar 2016
- I liked him.18th Mar 2016 prev next