Whenever I watch a murder mystery – whether it’s Sherlock, Broadchurch or Poirot – I never, ever guess who’s committed the crime. Being so stupid and clueless is a good thing because my enjoyment is enhanced by my genuine surprise when the person I least suspected is revealed as the killer. But when I read The Girl on The Train, the latest much-hyped best seller, I guessed who the baddie was almost immediately. And the more I ploughed on through the lumpen, over-descriptive, creative-writing-school prose, the more clunkingly obvious it became. So when my suspicions were finally confirmed, it was a dreary anti-climax. This can be attributed to one of two things: Either I’ve suddenly become a sharp, deductive genius or this is a truly appalling book. And I don’t think it would take Sherlock to come up with the answer.
The joy of being thick.

- It was no ord...27th Jul 2014
- Ever been to ...26th Jul 2014
- What note doe...25th Jul 2014
- The Commonwea...24th Jul 2014
- I never go to...23rd Jul 2014
- One is one.22nd Jul 2014
- He was just t...21st Jul 2014
- Heavy rain th...19th Jul 2014
- We all have o...18th Jul 2014
- He was a pale...17th Jul 2014
- Ken Livingsto...16th Jul 2014
- Do you know w...14th Jul 2014
- Tonight will ...13th Jul 2014
- My sister use...12th Jul 2014
- "Produced in ...10th Jul 2014 prev next