Whenever I watch a murder mystery – whether it’s Sherlock, Broadchurch or Poirot – I never, ever guess who’s committed the crime. Being so stupid and clueless is a good thing because my enjoyment is enhanced by my genuine surprise when the person I least suspected is revealed as the killer. But when I read The Girl on The Train, the latest much-hyped best seller, I guessed who the baddie was almost immediately. And the more I ploughed on through the lumpen, over-descriptive, creative-writing-school prose, the more clunkingly obvious it became. So when my suspicions were finally confirmed, it was a dreary anti-climax. This can be attributed to one of two things: Either I’ve suddenly become a sharp, deductive genius or this is a truly appalling book. And I don’t think it would take Sherlock to come up with the answer.
The joy of being thick.

- Sometimes you...1st Feb 2014
- Should that b...31st Jan 2014
- So Daft Punk ...30th Jan 2014
- Tony Blackbur...29th Jan 2014
- So it's our f...28th Jan 2014
- If in doubt, ...27th Jan 2014
- Ever woken up...26th Jan 2014
- Not much of a...25th Jan 2014
- What's the bi...24th Jan 2014
- Whatever happ...23rd Jan 2014
- The musical g...22nd Jan 2014
- God, I hate T...21st Jan 2014
- I felt almost...20th Jan 2014
- If you've nev...19th Jan 2014
- Steve Wright'...18th Jan 2014 prev next