Whenever I watch a murder mystery – whether it’s Sherlock, Broadchurch or Poirot – I never, ever guess who’s committed the crime. Being so stupid and clueless is a good thing because my enjoyment is enhanced by my genuine surprise when the person I least suspected is revealed as the killer. But when I read The Girl on The Train, the latest much-hyped best seller, I guessed who the baddie was almost immediately. And the more I ploughed on through the lumpen, over-descriptive, creative-writing-school prose, the more clunkingly obvious it became. So when my suspicions were finally confirmed, it was a dreary anti-climax. This can be attributed to one of two things: Either I’ve suddenly become a sharp, deductive genius or this is a truly appalling book. And I don’t think it would take Sherlock to come up with the answer.
The joy of being thick.

- "No eating, n...12th Oct 2013
- Pick a decade...11th Oct 2013
- I'd have like...10th Oct 2013
- 40 years of L...9th Oct 2013
- Paul Gambacci...7th Oct 2013
- I didn't beli...7th Oct 2013
- My wife's gon...5th Oct 2013
- "Say again......5th Oct 2013
- Say again5th Oct 2013
- No wonder I w...4th Oct 2013
- It would now ...3rd Oct 2013
- The hardest p...2nd Oct 2013
- We always got...1st Oct 2013
- Not going to ...29th Sep 2013
- Feeling lazy ...29th Sep 2013 prev next